Maerdy Colliery Explosion Wednesday 23rd December 1885
At approximately 2.40 p.m. on this day, a loud
report was heard above ground at Maerdy
Colliery and a column of smoke and dust was
seen to issue from the upcast shaft. These
signs, were recognisable to everyone familiar
with mining at that time as indicating another
in the terrible catalogue of disasters that
were the dread of everyone working, or living
with someone working, underground. Indeed,
tragedy had come to the close-knit community
of Maerdy with an explosion underground in the
'East Rhondda' district of Maerdy Colliery.
The disaster claimed the lives of eighty-one
men and boys, sixty-three from suffocation and
eighteen from burns and violence.
A Report into the 'Maerdy Colliery Explosion', by A.G.C.Liddell Barrister at Law who had attended the coroners inquest held at the Maerdy Hotel on the 12th to the18th January on behalf of The Secretary of State, was presented to both Houses of Parliament. He states the verdict of the Coroner's Court as being:
The Coal Mines regulations Act, 1872 laid down
regulations for when shot firing, for three
months after a mine had shown a presence of
gas whereby a 'blue cap on the flame of a
safety lamp' showed. In these circumstances
shot firing should only be undertaken if those
underground were evacuated from the area of
the mine where the firing was to take place.
These rules were to be observed 'where
practicable'. Mr. Liddell contends that for
reasons of time and trouble these rules were
deliberately flouted at Maerdy Colliery, where
lamps showing a blue flame were constantly
seen in the Colliery. Thus when daily shot
firing was undertaken in Maerdy's North
Western district, where 122 men were working,
only the five men working in the actual
heading were withdrawn a distance of fifty
yards from where the shot was fired.
Describing the actual explosion itself Mr.
Liddell states that the course of the blast
from the explosion was approximately one mile
long. After reviewing the evidence he goes on
to conclude that the explosion originated in
an area termed the North west dip, a branch
off from the main West heading, He then
relates the two theories as to the actual
cause of the explosion. Both theories are
based around an area where masons were
building an archway in a 30-foot high cavity
caused by a fall in the roof, the cavity being
deemed a danger as a place where gas might
accumulate. On the day of the explosion five
men were working on this arch on a platform
raised about six feet above the roadway, three
mason and two assistants. The assistants were
allowed to use a naked light of a type known
as a 'Comet'. Additionally in the same area, a
heading through stone was being driven towards
the 4ft. coal seam by blasting with shot. This
heading, Mr.Liddell states had only slight
deposits of coal dust and had never shown a
trace of gas.
With regards to the first theory, he contends that there was no permission given on the 23rd December for the day shift to fire a shot. Also the one shot hole that had been dug had, according to expert witnesses, never been fired. Additionally the bodies of the four men working on the stone heading at that time were actually found in the heading, whereas if a shot firing had taken place they would have adjourned to a place of safety. Regarding the second theory, he states it, as
being 'the probable cause of the disaster',
though he admits that there was enough
reasonable doubt to prevent the coroner's jury
from accepting it as fact. His support for
this theory is based on a number of factors.
The nature of the cavity and the space at its
top being above the airway constructed for
ventilation was, he claims, an ideal place for
gas to accumulate. A fireman in the colliery
had seen a blue flame, signifying traces of
gas, on his safety lamp some three months
prior to the explosion, a fact he had not
reported in the daily report book. Also on the
31st December, after the explosion, a
workmen's examiner found gas filling the
cavity down to about six inches above the
airway. This was despite extra precautions
being taken to dispel gas from the cavity
after the explosion. This suggested to Mr.
Liddell that the previous precautions would
also have been insufficient to dispel gas from
building up in the cavity. The direction of
the blast, as well as the unlikelihood of gas
collecting in any other part of the workings
in that area also supported his contention
that this is where the initial blast occurred.
Although the evidence was not conclusive as to
what actually did happen on 23rd December,
Mr.Liddell states that even if the explosion
did not occur in this manner that. ' There
can, I think, be no doubt that it was a
dangerous error of judgment to allow the use
of the 'Comet'' in the way that it was used.
Whatever the actual cause of the initial
explosion it was Mr. Liddell's conclusion that
the amount of gas involved could not account
for the ferocity of the blast that ensued.
Thus he believed that however the initial
blast occurred, it was the profusion of coal
dust in the workings that actually propagated
the explosion. Therefore he recommended to the
Home Secretary that ' a regular system of
watering and removal of dust in coal mines be
carried out, and put under a competent
officer'. In addition that, 'it would be
advisable to prohibit shot firing in dusty
parts of a mine without previous watering of
all places to which the flame of the shot
might extend'. |