Work
Colliers were then by no means
the only type of miner, but they were the largest
single group in the mine and carried out the basic
job of mining the coal. The only training which a
collier got was the training which he received as
a young boy working as an assistant to an experienced
collier-often his father or an elder brother.
The collier had other tasks to carry out in addition
to hewing the coal. This description by a mining engineer,
T. Foster Brown, in 1883, makes clear the total work
expected of the collier:
| ...The collier of South
Wales has to cut the coal and fill it
into the trams; he has to get the rubbish,
make and keep the working place safe and
in order, he has to keep his stall road
in travelling order, and do all the timbering
necessary in the working place. |
|
In 1900 one third of the coal seams
being worked in South Wales were below 3 feet in height
(below the level of the chair you are probably sitting
on) and even in 4 foot seams the collier would be
working on his knees and perhaps in water.
Along with all the dangers of underground work the
collier's task was of course, physically very hard
and exhausting. This extract from a poem written in
1938 by Idris Davies describes the strain of the work
and the conditions in which it was done:-
There are countless tons
of rock above his head,
And gases wait in secret corners for a
spark;
And his lamp shows dimly in the dust.
His leather belt is warm and moist with
sweat,
And he crouches against the hanging coal,
And the pick swings to and fro,
And many beads of salty sweat play about
his lips,
And trickle down the blackened skin
to the hairy tangle on the chest
the rats squeak and scamper among the
unused props,
and the fungus waxes strong. |
|
The number of hours spent by the
collier doing such hard work, per day and per week,
did decrease as the 19th century went on. In the 1860s
a twelve hour day, six days a week, would have been
the average. By the end of the century this had fallen
to about ten hours and in 1908 by Act of Parliament
an eight hour day was introduced although overtime
could be and still was worked. Even with this decrease
the effect of long hours doing such physical work
is clearly described by a miners' union leader from
South Wales, Vernon Hartshorn, giving evidence to
a' Government Commission in 1919:
| The colliery starts winding
coal at 7 o'clock in the morning. The
men have to be down somewhere between
6 and 7 o'clock ... They come up between
3 , and 4 ... So that we get the miner
in his pit clothes from about 5 in the
morning until, say, half past three when
he ascends the pit, and by the time he
gets home and has his food and a bath
and gets out of his pit clothes again,
it is half past four ... 1 think it is
true to say that during the whole of the
winter months a miner never gets more
than one or two hours of daylight on any
day except Sunday ... I know when I was
a growing lad after I got home in the
night and after getting my food . . .
feeling too tired and stiff and lifeless
to get a bath ... In the morning when
I was hauled out of bed, I felt it was
like going to the gallows to get up at
all ... |
|
Part of the pride which the collier
had in his status came precisely from the fact that
his job was one which required great strength. Colliers
were indeed proud of their work and the great skill
they had to show in doing it. Edmund Stonelake talking
about the early 20th century, explains how this pride
was to a large extent due to the great control which
the collier had over his work compared to other workers:-
| Before the days of machine
mining in South Wales each collier had
his own working place, in much the same
way as an allotment holder had his own
plot. He worked his plot in his own way
without interference from anyone; it was
his own little domain (territory) he worked,
and he had to live on what he got out
of it ... not even the manager dare tell
me how I should work my place, and this
was true of most colliers in South Wales. |
|
The fact that the collier did have
this independence and control over his work is an
important one to recognise and colliers in South Wales
were well known for refusing to be influenced by Colliery
managers and officials to speed up their work. The
custom of controlling output was described by Alexander
Dalziel, an official of the Coal owners Association,
in 1871 as follows:-
| In South Wales . . . the
collier 'nurses' his work. He remains
in the pit many more hours than the Northern
workmen, and yet raises individually much
less coal. All the rules of the pit, made
by the men . . . are in restraint (restriction)
of production. It is a point of honour
with them not to 'race'. |
|
As colliers were paid by the
amount of coal they produced, this custom obviously
resulted in harm to themselves. However, along with
the great desire to protect their independence it
was also probably a form of self-defence. In such
a hard job, if you were to remain a collier for
your working lifetime, then it was necessary to
work at the pace, and for the number of days a week,
that suited you best. Altogether, the collier was
a worker who seemed to value his control over his
work and the many other customs of the pit, almost
as much as he did the wages he received for his
work.
Wages
Evidence on wages
is incomplete and difficult to understand. In the
case of miner' wages the difficulties are so great
as to almost defy any understanding. Obviously, however,
they were very important to the miner and his family.
The collier was usually a pieceworker (that is he
was paid for the amount of work he did). Other miners
were paid for a day's work of so many hours. Below
are the amounts paid each day to these workers as
a result of the Minimum Wage Act of 1912. You can
see again the great variety of mining jobs and the
variation in paid for them.
As far as the collier paid by piecework is concerned,
there are three factors to take into account in showing
how he earned his wages:-
- He was paid so much per ton of large
coal that he cut.
|
|
| For other jobs that he
had to do such as ripping the roof of
the seam (to allow room for horses and
trams to get in), gobbing (packing rubbish
into the gap left where he had removed
the coal) and timbering (putting up props
to support the roof) he would be paid
by the inch, foot, yard etc. |
|
| The amount for the two
jobs above would be added together and
then a percentage would 'be added to this
total to give the total wage. Whereas
the amount paid for the first two jobs
would be decided for each different seam
in each different colliery, the percentage
was the same all over the coalfield and
was meant to reflect the increase in the
selling price of coal above a standard
price agreed between the Coal owners and.
the miners in a certain year. |
|
It, not much easier to deal with
the actual amount of wages which miners received in
South Wales in the period up to 1920! Wages were certainly
going up: one historian calculates that average wages
of colliers were no more than 2 shillings and sixpence
a day in 1800 but by 1914 they had risen to 9 shillings
and four pence a day. However, precisely because colliers
were pieceworkers ' averages are almost meaningless.
Conditions would vary from time to time in the same
working places, resulting in the collier never being
able to mine the same amount of coal each day. These
conditions and the prices paid for work would also
vary from seam to seam in the same colliery and from
colliery to colliery across the coalfield. Also there
would be deductions made from the miners' wages and
he might miss a day's work through illness, injury,
strikes etc. Therefore, even the same miner working
in the same place might earn very different amounts
from week to week.
One final point can be made on this question of wages.
To really see what changes in wage rates actually
meant you have to compare them with the movement of
prices. Again the evidence here is very difficult
to use but one historian has estimated that colliers
on average were actually three times better off at
the end of the 19th century than at the start, even
allowing for price increases.